Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 16:45:57 +0100 From: John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st> To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org>, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>, Guido Falsi <madpilot@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r388648 - in head/net: asterisk11 asterisk13 Message-ID: <5640BFB5.6010107@marino.st> In-Reply-To: <BF08F2E2-64D0-433B-ACE4-270886594519@adamw.org> References: <201506052330.t55NUBZL020965@svn.freebsd.org> <alpine.LSU.2.20.1511082001320.2548@anthias> <564044BC.5050203@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.LSU.2.20.1511091255000.2548@anthias> <077EDBDC-8EF1-44FA-9D17-90345C2956F5@adamw.org> <20151109153801.GA60954@FreeBSD.org> <BF08F2E2-64D0-433B-ACE4-270886594519@adamw.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/9/2015 4:41 PM, Adam Weinberger wrote: > > I think the difference there is pedantic, and possibly more confusing. While > it is true that "build with" may not always be accurate, "use" is so generic > as to convey practically nothing. > > My vote is for "Build with modern GCC (from ports)" Except there's no building if GCC is already in place. The real impact is GCC libraries, which makes the *entire* GCC a run-time dependency. That's the kicker, not the building. Is subpackages here yet? John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5640BFB5.6010107>