From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Sep 12 12:42:33 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CDE8F36;
 Fri, 12 Sep 2014 12:42:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ainaz.pair.com (ainaz.pair.com [209.68.2.66])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37D1EB57;
 Fri, 12 Sep 2014 12:42:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.132] (vie-188-118-244-060.dsl.sil.at
 [188.118.244.60])
 by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 848903F478;
 Fri, 12 Sep 2014 08:42:31 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 14:42:29 +0200 (CEST)
From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
To: Andrey Chernov <ache@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Can't build lang/gcc port on i386: segmentation fault
In-Reply-To: <5412E64E.7050701@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1409121436401.2669@tuna.site>
References: <5412D743.70005@freebsd.org>
 <alpine.LSU.2.11.1409121400460.2669@tuna.site> <5412E4A1.7040101@freebsd.org>
 <5412E64E.7050701@freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 12:42:33 -0000

On Fri, 12 Sep 2014, Andrey Chernov wrote:
>> As I just found, it builds with BOOTSTRAP nice, so apparently clang
>> makes some damage. You can see CFLAGS in the log. Swap is 4GB I think it
>> is large enough. Nothing special otherwise.
> BTW, previous 4.7* as lang/gcc build fine even without BOOTSTRAP.

I am curious, what happens when you try lang/gcc48?

My expectation would be both lang/gcc and lang/gcc48 to behave
the same, since it's a very similar codebase, gcc48 just a bit
newer on the same branch.

We could make BOOTSTRAP the default for lang/gcc, though not 
doing that and thus building a lot faster has been one of the 
features of lang/gcc. -- Since it does not reproduce for me,
do others see the same failure?

Gerald