From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Feb 4 9:17:48 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mail.inka.de (quechua.inka.de [212.227.14.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D2D737B503 for ; Sun, 4 Feb 2001 09:17:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from kemoauc.mips.inka.de (uucp@) by mail.inka.de with local-bsmtp id 14PSn2-0007zU-00; Sun, 4 Feb 2001 18:17:28 +0100 Received: (from daemon@localhost) by kemoauc.mips.inka.de (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f14GkKm44533 for freebsd-chat@freebsd.org; Sun, 4 Feb 2001 17:46:20 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from daemon) From: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) Subject: Re: UNIX-like approach to software and system architecture Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 16:46:20 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <95k10s$1bfc$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de> References: <20010203135902.M94275@lpt.ens.fr> <4.3.2.7.2.20010203110403.048e78e0@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20010204080917.049ecca0@localhost> <20010204162732.A50591@lpt.ens.fr> Originator: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Rahul Siddharthan wrote: > I believe OpenBSD avoided the recent BIND bug, but they still bundle > their version of BIND 4.x because they aren't satisfied about the > security of later versions. Do they plan to work on a BIND > substitute, The sentiment has been expressed that a BIND replacement ought to be written, but I'm not aware of any actual plans from OpenBSD developers to do so. BIND9 will probably receive some scrutiny. > or pick up djbdns? Given the license this is basically impossible. > DJB himself seems to favour OpenBSD as an operating system. OpenBSD doesn't seem to favor DJB's programs, though. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message