From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Jul 16 17:40:08 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id RAA14617
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 16 Jul 1995 17:40:08 -0700
Received: from fslg8.fsl.noaa.gov (fslg8.fsl.noaa.gov [137.75.131.171])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id RAA14611
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 16 Jul 1995 17:40:07 -0700
Received: by fslg8.fsl.noaa.gov (5.57/Ultrix3.0-C)
	id AA02536; Sun, 16 Jul 95 18:40:05 -0600
Received: by emu.fsl.noaa.gov (1.38.193.4/SMI-4.1 (1.38.193.4))
	id AA23943; Sun, 16 Jul 1995 18:43:17 -0600
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 1995 18:43:17 -0600
From: kelly@fsl.noaa.gov (Sean Kelly)
Message-Id: <9507170043.AA23943@emu.fsl.noaa.gov>
To: filo@yahoo.com
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199507162343.QAA05963@lobo.yahoo.com> (filo@yahoo.com)
Subject: Re: Ignoring SIGCHLD without having to wait()?
Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

Unless you're using SIGCHLD for ``something else,'' what's wrong with
installing a one-line signal hander that wait()s for the process?

PS: Thanks for the Yahoo database.

-- 
Sean Kelly
NOAA Forecast Systems Lab, Boulder Colorado USA

I read that when the archaeologists dug down into the ancient
cemetery, they found fragments of *human bones*! What kind of
barbarians were these people, anyway?  -- Jack Handey