From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 3 19:17:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9336616A41F for ; Mon, 3 Oct 2005 19:17:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arne_woerner@yahoo.com) Received: from web30308.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web30308.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.200.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E7C243D46 for ; Mon, 3 Oct 2005 19:17:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arne_woerner@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 39156 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Oct 2005 19:17:04 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=BXPdPXK/JYn3PlPfTgGnbgIecY4re0HWRQAY5ARGSj0C7vn1Z4EBw5KpMrbd3jJmQ4OXy9Mw+Er/djg4BkNc54LGW+I0AjEhuXw1F7+PnB2huo+PJSDF+kjyYAtmAIAMXvzdswoSAyDS4hNmo73xrDIQrMttzs2vsmjXc8VHXmk= ; Message-ID: <20051003191704.39154.qmail@web30308.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [213.54.67.241] by web30308.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 12:17:04 PDT Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 12:17:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Arne "Wörner" To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: pf / queue+stateful / r generated rules assigned to the right queue? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 19:17:06 -0000 Hiho! I use pf. Since my server cannot process gracefully a 20Mb/s stream on one NIC, while ntpd (or ping) runs on the other NIC (round trip times increase from about 60msec to 300msec), I tried to limit the sporadic big data stream to not more than 9Mb/s. When I look at "pfctl -s queue -vv" it looks like, just one way is mentioned in the statistic, while the generated corresponding rule (I use "keep state") isn't a member of any queue, which would be a bug... I would be glad, if somebody could help me, 1. to understand this, 2. to do some tests, that make clear, if pf's queue implementation is buggy, and 3. to fix a problem, if there is a problem... :-)) Bye Arne ______________________________________________________ Yahoo! for Good Donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort. http://store.yahoo.com/redcross-donate3/