From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Aug 3 23:21:22 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from fellspt.charm.net (fellspt.charm.net [199.0.70.29]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 225C61530B for ; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 23:21:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dutch@charm.net) Received: from charm.net (coretel-115-060.charm.net [209.143.115.60]) by fellspt.charm.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA14993; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 02:20:28 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <37A7DB91.FC256FC5@charm.net> Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 02:20:02 -0400 From: Dutch Collins X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.2-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Allen Cleveland Cc: Kent Stewart , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SETI@home error References: <3.0.5.32.19990804012031.00800bd0@mindsieve.com> <3.0.5.32.19990804020752.007fb100@mindsieve.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Allen Cleveland wrote: > > At 10:46 PM 8/3/99 -0700, Kent Stewart wrote: > > > > > >Allen Cleveland wrote: > >> > >> I've just installed, from the ports collection, the setiathome client and > >> I'm getting the following error once it has a work unit: > >> > >> Bad file header > >> > >> Sadly, thats all I get. It might be worth mentioning that I initially > >> tried running all the freebsd clients that are available from the seti web > >> site and all returned the same error. This is what leads me to believe > >> I've left something out, rather than the work units actually being > >> corrupt. This is also the reason I've installed it from the ports > >> collection and am now asking if anyone here has any ideas. > > > >You have to have setup an account with Berkeley. Did you do that. I > >have been running version 1.2 for FreeBSD 3.2 for a little over a > >month. > > > >Kent > > Oh.. I've an account.. the web sites says I've 'completed more work units > than 96.371% of our users.' :) I want to see how much better the fbsd box > does than the wintel boxes :) > > > > >> > >> setiathome version: > >> > >> bash-2.03# cat version.txt > >> major_version=1 > >> minor_version=1 > >> > >> freebsd version: > >> > >> bash-2.03# uname -a > >> FreeBSD roswell 3.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 3.2-RELEASE #0: Sun Jun 13 05:43:26 > >> EDT 1999 root@roswell:/usr/src/sys/compile/ROSWELL i386 > >> > >> -- > >> Allen Cleveland allenc@mindsieve.com > >> There is no try. Do, or do not do, but no try. -Yoda > >> > >> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > >> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > > >-- > >Kent Stewart > >Richland, WA > > > >mailto:kstewart@3-cities.com > >http://www.3-cities.com/~kstewart/index.html > > > >SETI(Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) @ HOME > >http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ > > > -- > Allen Cleveland allenc@mindsieve.com > There is no try. Do, or do not do, but no try. -Yoda > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message I bet you need to create a new account because you are using new software. The only use I have had for win98 lately is to run the win98 version. It is neat looking. -d To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message