From owner-freebsd-doc Sat May 25 22:27:13 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from turbine.trit.org (turbine.trit.org [63.198.170.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69B6037B404 for ; Sat, 25 May 2002 22:27:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from turbine.trit.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turbine.trit.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AD053E5E; Sun, 26 May 2002 05:27:09 +0000 (UTC) To: Andre Guibert de Bruet Cc: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jail(2) man page In-Reply-To: <20020526010802.D59365-200000@alpha.siliconlandmark.com>; from andy@siliconlandmark.com on "Sun, 26 May 2002 01:16:41 -0400 (EDT)" Date: Sun, 26 May 2002 05:27:09 +0000 From: Dima Dorfman Message-Id: <20020526052710.1AD053E5E@turbine.trit.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: > I was reading the jail(2) man page and came across the following: > > Further jail() calls chroot(2) internally, so the it can fail for all the > same reasons. Please consult the chroot(2) manual page for details. > > I think what was intended was: > > Further jail() calls chroot(2) internally, so that it can fail for all the > same reasons. Please consult the chroot(2) manual page for details. "so that" makes failing sound like a goal rather than a possible consequence; I think getting rid of the "the" after "so" has the desired effect, though, and I've just fixed it in -current. Thanks for noticing and reporting this error! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message