From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Oct 15 01:13:44 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF962106566B;
	Thu, 15 Oct 2009 01:13:44 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from qing.li@bluecoat.com)
Received: from whisker.bluecoat.com (whisker.bluecoat.com [216.52.23.28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D61E88FC1A;
	Thu, 15 Oct 2009 01:13:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bcs-mail03.internal.cacheflow.com ([10.2.2.95])
	by whisker.bluecoat.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n9F1DiO9000091;
	Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:13:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:12:41 -0700
Message-ID: <B583FBF374231F4A89607B4D08578A43046736DE@bcs-mail03.internal.cacheflow.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: ARP Changes
Thread-Index: AcpNNJf6RjDjdETRRwma32MIH3lQ0Q==
From: "Li, Qing" <qing.li@bluecoat.com>
To: <lab@gta.com>, <qingli@freebsd.org>
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ARP Changes
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 01:13:45 -0000


>
> I know that arp has changed a lot in FreeBSD 8.  I am wondering if one
> change was by design?  In older versions of FreeBSD, if you ping a =
host
> that is on a local network but is down, after a few seconds ping =
displays:
>	ping: sendto: Host is down
>	ping: sendto: Host is down
>

  This turned out to be a regression bug. A wrong variable is used and
  the incomplete entry was timing out too fast. So the ARP probe =
continues
  indefinitely ...
 =20
>
> Using arp to display the arp table shows:
>
>	host.domain (x.x.x.x) at (incomplete) on em0 [ethernet]

  I wasn't returning incomplete entries, but now I am ...

  I have a patch for both issues, but I need to clean up the code
  because that wrong variable is used elsewhere in the same module.

  I should be able to commit a permanent fix by tomorrow.

  -- Qing