Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 05:26:55 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 273219] math/openblas: update to 0.3.23 Message-ID: <bug-273219-7788-o9oUWhd9Al@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-273219-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-273219-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D273219 Eijiro Shibusawa <phd_kimberlite@yahoo.co.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #244205|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #244787| |maintainer-approval+ Flags| | --- Comment #4 from Eijiro Shibusawa <phd_kimberlite@yahoo.co.jp> --- Created attachment 244787 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D244787&action= =3Dedit update to 0.3.24 (In reply to Daniel Engberg from comment #1) Hi,=20 I' ve created a patch for latest 0.3.24. > Is this something we need to take into consideration? > https://archlinux.org/news/openblas-0323-2-update-requires-manual-interve= ntion/ This issue is not related to the update created this time. The port contains optimized LAPACK routine and CBLAS/LAPACKE like previous version. I did not understand that why do you try to talk about issue on other linux distribution? > Can we use upstream's release archive instead of the GitHub generated one? > https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/releases/tag/v0.3.23 portlint does not report fatal error, so I think it is fine to leave it as = is. > Can we drop the AVX/AVX2 options in favour of CPUTYPE? > https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/tree/share/examples/etc/make.conf#n25 NO, I think that it is the user's choice whether to enable or disable SIMD instructions. > Gentoo seems to carry a few patches that might be beneficial for us too > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/tree/sci-libs/openblas Again, I did not understand that why do you try to talk about issue on other linux distribution? Do you mean it is better to separate optimized LAPACK routine and CBLAS/LAP= ACKE from the port? So could you clarify your intentions or create a patch please? Thanks in advance! --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-273219-7788-o9oUWhd9Al>