From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Aug 6 17:20: 7 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B7F37BC28 for ; Sun, 6 Aug 2000 17:20:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id RAA68204; Sun, 6 Aug 2000 17:20:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2000 17:20:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200008070020.RAA68204@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Roland McGrath Subject: Re: kern/20448: expired dynamic rules shown in "ipfw get" output Reply-To: Roland McGrath Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR kern/20448; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Roland McGrath To: Bill Fumerola Cc: roland+freebsd@frob.com, freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/20448: expired dynamic rules shown in "ipfw get" output Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2000 20:16:09 -0400 (EDT) > I believe this has to be called at splnet(). I'll buy that. But it seems to me that the walks of the hash table that go on there ought perhaps to be done at splnet too. Though I guess in practice lower levels only read and never mutate the list structure. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message