Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 03:40:00 +0000 (GMT) From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> To: imp@village.org (Warner Losh) Cc: kkennawa@physics.adelaide.edu.au, andre.albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: runsocks (Was Re: gpib driver - does anybody use it?) Message-ID: <199902200340.UAA27001@usr02.primenet.com> In-Reply-To: <199902170508.WAA51372@harmony.village.org> from "Warner Losh" at Feb 16, 99 10:08:05 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> : Yeah, this doesn't comple for some reason as of about 1.0r4. The port just > : doesn't bother trying to install it - no-one's cared enough to look at why > : it's broken and how to fix it. > > It is broken because it assume too many implementation details about > symbols being defined. A more accurate description would be that no > one has cared enough to actually fix it. :-) This seems to me to be a perfect use for netgraph: a socks based interface in the kernel so that applications didn't need to be brutalized to work with socks. Hee hee hee... Would this be a "transparent socksy"? Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199902200340.UAA27001>