From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 28 00:01:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F198416A4E0; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 00:01:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrappy@freebsd.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56D0943D46; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 00:01:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost (wm.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C97D2290C74; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 21:01:43 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32241-03; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 00:01:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1046) id 45404291AFE; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 21:01:43 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 402FA290C74; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 21:01:43 -0300 (ADT) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 21:01:43 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" X-X-Sender: freebsd@hub.org To: "Simon L. Nielsen" In-Reply-To: <20060827230002.GG1149@zaphod.nitro.dk> Message-ID: <20060827205909.K82634@hub.org> References: <20060825233420.V82634@hub.org> <20060827230002.GG1149@zaphod.nitro.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BSDStats - What is involved ... ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 00:01:56 -0000 On Mon, 28 Aug 2006, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > On 2006.08.25 23:36:12 -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > >> In getting this into the base system itself? Opt-in, default turned off, >> of course, but maybe as an option in sysinstall to be enabled easily? > > What is the advantage of having it in the base system compared to > ports? IMHO, official recognition ... more ppl will hopefully enable/use it if its part of the system itself, vs a "third party add on", which ports tends to denote ...