From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 14:51:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE59B37B401 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 14:51:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.westbend.net (ns1.westbend.net [216.47.253.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0D8643F75 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 14:51:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hetzels@westbend.net) Received: from Admin02 (admin02.westbend.net [216.47.253.19]) by mail.westbend.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h6TLpoHZ053073; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 16:51:51 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from hetzels@westbend.net) Message-ID: <0cca01c3561b$a1230b40$13fd2fd8@Admin02> From: "Scot W. Hetzel" To: "Mike Makonnen" , "Jens Rehsack" References: <3F26AA16.5030007@liwing.de> <20030729172122.GA5005@kokeb.ambesa.net> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 16:51:54 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) cc: FreeBSD-Current List Subject: Re: [PATCH] jail NG schript patch for mounting devfs and procfsautomatically X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 21:51:54 -0000 From: "Mike Makonnen" > On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:08:38PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: > > >Someone, and unfortunately I appear to have lost track of who, had some > > >tweaks to the rcNG scripts to set up some reasonable devfs rules for a > > >jail, and apply them to the devfs mounted in a jail. Otherwise, you risk > > >exposing "undesired" device nodes to the virtual environment. I suspect a > > >search of the -current archives will turn up who, but I think a necessary > > >part of a solution here will be to make sure jails are set up with the > > >right devfs contents. > > > > Sorry, overseen. Sct W. Hetzel was the submitter, but it never becomes > > committed. If could be be so kind, please :-) (of course, not without > > prove it first) > > Yeah, I'll take care of this. I had asked scott to mail me his final > patch so I could commit it, but I never heard back from him. I'll > dig out the revisions from my mail archives and combine the > two. > I thought I had submitted my final patch, the only thing left was what number to use for the default jail devfs rule. We also need a way to load user defined devfs rules. I'll need to re-cvs diff my current devfs and jail scripts, before I'll be able to send them again. Scot