From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Mar 15 19:28:39 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id TAA25656
          for current-outgoing; Fri, 15 Mar 1996 19:28:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dyson.iquest.net (dyson.iquest.net [198.70.144.127])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id TAA25648
          Fri, 15 Mar 1996 19:28:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from root@localhost) by dyson.iquest.net (8.6.11/8.6.9) id WAA05025; Fri, 15 Mar 1996 22:23:18 GMT
From: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net>
Message-Id: <199603152223.WAA05025@dyson.iquest.net>
Subject: Re: -current and accelx
To: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert)
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1996 22:23:18 +0000 ()
Cc: dawes@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au, sos@FreeBSD.org, coredump@nervosa.com,
        mmead@Glock.COM, current@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <199603160228.TAA14695@phaeton.artisoft.com> from "Terry Lambert" at Mar 15, 96 07:28:53 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> In any case, you are not misinterpreting MAP_SHARED, IMO.
> 
It has been difficult to figure out what to do about this...  What should
we do about MAP_SHARED mappings in the case of fork()?  Note that MAP_PRIVATE
mappings are inherited (shared libs for example.)

John