From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Feb 12 12:38:48 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DBCAAA30D2 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 12:38:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsdml@marino.st) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE9B67E1; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 12:38:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsdml@marino.st) Received: from [192.168.1.21] (248.Red-83-39-200.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [83.39.200.248]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0C8343C1F; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 06:38:44 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: Removing documentation To: lev@FreeBSD.org, Royce Williams References: <56B754A8.3030605@marino.st> <56BCE01D.4010701@FreeBSD.org> <56BCE218.40403@marino.st> <56BCEC5F.4020007@marino.st> <56BDCF5D.5020101@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Kevin Oberman , FreeBSD Mailing List From: John Marino Message-ID: <56BDD251.40207@marino.st> Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 13:38:41 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56BDCF5D.5020101@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 12:38:48 -0000 On 2/12/2016 1:26 PM, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 12.02.2016 03:22, Royce Williams wrote: > >> As long as the ports system exists (and I think it should!), the >> management of compilation requirements -- especially for something >> that might need to be bootstrapped early, like a software >> management tool -- is a valid topic. > THIS. What "This"? He was wrong. There's no bootstrapping. It doesn't apply. You are "thumbs up"ing a fallacy. It makes no sense at all. I am sure is sounds great though.