From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 3 00:37:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB9F106564A; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 00:37:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 002578FC12; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 00:37:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from JRE-MBP-2.local (c-67-180-24-15.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.180.24.15]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q730bJ2R001942 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 2 Aug 2012 17:37:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <501B1D3A.6080501@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 17:37:14 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton References: <612DA8A3-121E-4E72-9E5B-F3CBA9DEB7F7@bsdimp.com> <501A0258.4010101@FreeBSD.org> <45815622-3CE2-42E3-B118-702AA70C7E4C@samsco.org> <501AB08E.8020008@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <501AB08E.8020008@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Garrett Cooper , FreeBSD Hackers , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Warner Losh , Arnaud Lacombe Subject: Re: On cooperative work [Was: Re: newbus' ivar's limitation..] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 00:37:23 -0000 On 8/2/12 9:53 AM, Doug Barton wrote: > On 08/02/2012 09:44, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> The "Watson/Losh connection" worked really well in BSDCan 2010 :). > I wasn't going to mention that, since I didn't want to tell tales out of > school. But the fact that remote participation actually was provided for > "the right people," even though I was told repeatedly that it wasn't > possible, actually highlights a big part of the problem. bandwidth was limited and a single 1:1 skype connection was all we really could do. I did broadcast sessions a few years ago using the apple quicktime server but it was a lot of work and I think one person looked at part of one session. > Doug