From owner-svn-src-stable-11@freebsd.org Fri Dec 30 01:17:48 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-stable-11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7CAEC97358; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 01:17:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B2E019B0; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 01:17:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id uBU1HkI7008659; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 17:17:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd-rwg@localhost) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id uBU1HkpP008658; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 17:17:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <201612300117.uBU1HkpP008658@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: svn commit: r310773 - in stable/11/sys: netinet netinet6 In-Reply-To: <20161229191838.GB23243@freefall.freebsd.org> To: "Piotr P. Stefaniak" Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 17:17:46 -0800 (PST) CC: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Michael Tuexen , svn-src-stable-11@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: svn-src-stable-11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for only the 11-stable src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 01:17:48 -0000 -- Start of PGP signed section. > On 2016-12-29 18:09:39, Piotr P. Stefaniak wrote: > >2) the option -ta was added > > To clarify, what I mean is that the process that generates the sources > started using the -ta switch of indent(1), not that the feature was > recently implemented. Can you clarify what process these source files are generated by? If these are not the source files, but are being generated by some other thing then wouldn't we want the true sources and the generation process in the repsitory? If this is running indent(1) over source files to clean them up, then that is not "generating" sources per say, but instead cleaning them up with indent(1). -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org