From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 20 10:10:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F9610656C0 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 10:10:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 035FB8FC1B for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 10:10:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o7KAA3xf089479 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 10:10:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o7KAA3a1089478; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 10:10:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 10:10:03 GMT Message-Id: <201008201010.o7KAA3a1089478@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org From: walter@pelissero.de (Walter C. Pelissero) Cc: Subject: Re: kern/149762: volume labels with rogue characters X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Walter C. Pelissero" List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 10:10:04 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/149762; it has been noted by GNATS. From: walter@pelissero.de (Walter C. Pelissero) To: jhell Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/149762: volume labels with rogue characters Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:58:12 +0200 jhell writes: > Putting aside whats written below, please don't feel that this is an > attack on your work to make this happen. Attack on my work? Amusing. > I feel your work is very viable for what it is supposed to do but > to the same effect does not address the issue that this might > happen elsewhere to anything new that may be introduced to the > system at a later point in time What don't you understand in: Now kern.geom.label.sanitation can be set to zero (default) obtaining the usual behaviour without "hack". > In a previous post I mentioned a proper full term solution based on > adjusting devfs/devd instead that would fit future situations and > not call for individual adjustments for pieces of geom or anything > related. I failed to see the devfs/devd solution you mention. > It has be ~6 years that GEOM_LABEL was introduced to the system. > r131476 | pjd | 2004-07-02 15:40:36 -0400 (Fri, 02 Jul 2004) | 22 lines conf/37569 Mon Apr 29 08:40:01 PDT 2002 The common issue of all the already mentioned PRs is: mounting volumes with names that are not compatible with fstab (and a lot of other things). Which this modification of geom_label could mitigate. There is a related PR of mine, which tackles the problem from the fstab stand point, that does more or less what the other PR has been already suggesting since 2002 and Linux has been doing for more than a decade. It was closed by a sulky baby boy on the same grounds as this. -- walter pelissero http://www.pelissero.de