From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Jan 21 22:51:28 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA18766
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 21 Jan 1997 22:51:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rocky.mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA18758
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 21 Jan 1997 22:51:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.mt.sri.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id XAA24362; Tue, 21 Jan 1997 23:47:06 -0700 (MST)
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1997 23:47:06 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <199701220647.XAA24362@rocky.mt.sri.com>
From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
To: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net>
Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, hackers@freebsd.org,
        terry@lambert.org
Subject: Re: Terry
In-Reply-To: <l03010d03af0b2240fcc6@[208.2.87.3]>
References: <199701212037.NAA19913@phaeton.artisoft.com>
	<19361.853887384@time.cdrom.com>
	<l03010d03af0b2240fcc6@[208.2.87.3]>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> I do not take it lightly. As for "explaining it", I have REPEATEDLY been
> told that the ONLY acceptable "explanation" is a FULLY working
> implementation. These people do not seem to grasp conceptual designs.
> Instead they are stuck at the "nuts and bolts" level.

And I'll again remind you that I volunteerED (note the past tense) to
work with you on building the next generation system *months* ago if you
could show me a working prototype.  I *never* received a reply from you
accepting/rejecting the offer, so my offer was withdrawn after 2 months
of waiting with nothing to show for.  I'm not going to commit my time
for something that simply isn't going to occur because of yet another
excuse.

I was willing to work with you and yet when you had what you publically
asked for you still refused to do anything.



Nate