From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Feb 6 11:32:47 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA24228 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 11:32:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (gdi.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.30]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA24216 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 11:32:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.8.4/8.6.12) with SMTP id LAA01539; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 11:31:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 6 Feb 1997 11:31:28 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White X-Sender: dwhite@localhost Reply-To: Doug White To: Brent Russell cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: installation In-Reply-To: <199702042120.QAA08649@sable.cc.vt.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 4 Feb 1997, Brent Russell wrote: > I currently run Windows95 on a single DOS partition. Should I install > WindowsNT 4.0, or FreeBSD 2.1.6.1 first? Will it make a difference? I'd install WinNT first. That way if something blows up or NT gets envious it can't kill FreeBSD. It can also have it's way with the boot sector -- assuming it does what Win95 does, it'll erase it, and if you install FreeBSD first with the boot manager, it'll blank it out. Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major