From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 8 03:15:18 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8509F03 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 03:15:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E3172B98 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 03:15:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r983FHgh031970; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 20:15:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r983FHEA031969; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 20:15:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 20:15:17 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: Lyndon Nerenberg Subject: Re: rcs Message-ID: <20131008031517.GA31864@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <77307DF8-637D-4295-BF47-8742F1552CE8@orthanc.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <77307DF8-637D-4295-BF47-8742F1552CE8@orthanc.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 03:15:18 -0000 On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 07:31:01PM -0700, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > Okay folks, can we make a call about keeping the RCS tools in the base? > > The proponents wanting to remove RCS need to speak up and make their > technical case. > I don't care if rcs stays or goes, but ... There is a 15 year gap in ChangeLog at http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/rcs.git/tree/src/ChangeLog?h=p Maybe there was no development for 15 years. However, the 7364 lines in ChangeLog after 2010-02-04 suggests that there may be few bugs to worry about. -- Steve