From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun 26 17:20:12 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72E4B16A400
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:20:12 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com)
Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com
	(mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09F8513C468
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:20:11 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com)
Received: from collaborativefusion.com (mx01.pub.collaborativefusion.com
	[206.210.89.201]) (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA)
	by wingspan with esmtp; Tue, 26 Jun 2007 13:20:11 -0400
	id 00056423.46814ACB.00004C0C
Received: from Internal Mail-Server by mx01 (envelope-from
	bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com)
	with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; 26 Jun 2007 12:20:10 -0500
From: "Brian A. Seklecki" <bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com>
To: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com>
In-Reply-To: <20070626153618.GG6494@dan.emsphone.com>
References: <46812FE9.2050104@esiee.fr>
	<20070626153618.GG6494@dan.emsphone.com>
Organization: Collaborative Fusion, Inc.
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 13:20:09 -0400
Message-Id: <1182878409.67654.61.camel@soundwave.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port 
x-pineapp-mail-mail-from: bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com
x-pineapp-mail-rcpt-to: dnelson@allantgroup.com
Cc: Frank Bonnet <f.bonnet@esiee.fr>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Bondbind  like for FreeBSD ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:20:12 -0000

On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 10:36 -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
> >  ethernet load balancing or trunking that use the Cisco's
> >  etherchannel ) ?
> 

Very cool.

Two questions:

1) "fec" and "lacp" must be used against the same physical switch,
correct? 

2) What is the deterministic logic behind active/standby for "failover"?
A heartbeat on the segment or physical interface state change?

TIA,
~BAS

> You can use the lagg device in 6-stable and -current; if you're
> running
> 6.2 or older you can use ng_fec or ng_one2many, but they both use
> static configuration and aren't as nice. 
-- 
Brian A. Seklecki <bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com>
Collaborative Fusion, Inc.




IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient (or the individual responsible for the delivery of this message to an intended recipient), please be advised that any re-use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is prohibited.  Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.