Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 18:27:03 +0000 From: Karl Pielorz <kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk> To: Tiago Ribeiro <shasty@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FBSD 10.0-S (r261289M) under XenServer 6.2 - Stuck sshd in urdlck? Message-ID: <99F7D2597E4C027C4A2CA612@study64.tdx.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <E19B6E95-DCC9-4B9C-9D0E-FB1DA00DF0D7@gmail.com> References: <4B8380EBE379080FAD3271FA@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> <53272E41.3050409@citrix.com> <6534613783544E26A15CF44F@study64.tdx.co.uk> <5328076C.9000304@citrix.com> <0A15EC23852EB144F19A5228@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> <3F0F9C1A-5592-4BD7-959B-41E9FE82F3C4@gmail.com> <6BE837DA9C77A75B05B53672@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> <E19B6E95-DCC9-4B9C-9D0E-FB1DA00DF0D7@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--On 18 March 2014 08:42:00 -0300 Tiago Ribeiro <shasty@gmail.com> wrote: > I think some people report this error in oder list. > Here is part of email send to list: > >>> # ps afx >>> >>> 15961 - Is 0:00.02 sshd: wendell [priv] (sshd) >>> 15962 - Z 0:00.00 <defunct> >>> >>> # uname -a >>> FreeBSD bacula 10.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE #0 r260789: Thu Jan 16 >>> 22:34:59 UTC 2014 root@snap.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC >>> amd64 Thanks, I found the thread using the above on -stable and have posted to that (it didn't mention urdlck - which is why I probably missed it the first time round with Google et'al). Regards and thanks for the replies, -Karl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?99F7D2597E4C027C4A2CA612>