From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 28 19:40:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A099D16A473 for ; Mon, 28 May 2007 19:40:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DB1513C4C5 for ; Mon, 28 May 2007 19:40:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l4SJeBCh034410 for ; Mon, 28 May 2007 19:40:11 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l4SJeB5k034409; Mon, 28 May 2007 19:40:11 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 19:40:11 GMT Message-Id: <200705281940.l4SJeB5k034409@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Rene Ladan Cc: Subject: Re: ports/113099: [PATCH] sysutils/libchk may skip $X11BASE now X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Rene Ladan List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 19:40:12 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/113099; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Rene Ladan To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/113099: [PATCH] sysutils/libchk may skip $X11BASE now Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 21:18:02 +0200 Edwin Groothuis wrote: > Maintainer of sysutils/libchk, > > Please note that PR ports/113099 has just been submitted. > > If it contains a patch for an upgrade, an enhancement or a bug fix > you agree on, reply to this email stating that you approve the patch > and a committer will take care of it. > > The full text of the PR can be found at: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/113099 > According to ${PORTSDIR}/Mk/bsd.port.mk, ${X11BASE} now _defaults_ to ${LOCALBASE}, but users can still choose to set ${X11BASE} to another directory than ${LOCALBASE} when USE_NONDEFAULT_X11BASE is set (on my box they're the same} I'm cc'ing x11@ to get some general consensus. -- GPG fingerprint = E738 5471 D185 7013 0EE0 4FC8 3C1D 6F83 12E1 84F6 (subkeys.pgp.net) "It won't fit on the line." -- me, 2001