From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 27 23:19:59 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E70B8DEE for ; Sat, 27 Dec 2014 23:19:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sender1.zohomail.com (sender1.zohomail.com [74.201.84.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D351BCBF for ; Sat, 27 Dec 2014 23:19:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from workbox.Home (184-100-71-241.mpls.qwest.net [184.100.71.241]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1419722390814681.2795199221125; Sat, 27 Dec 2014 15:19:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2014 17:19:48 -0600 From: Bigby James To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: hw.syscons.bell not working? Message-ID: <20141227231948.GA17193@workbox.Home> References: <549F30BC.20500@intersonic.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <549F30BC.20500@intersonic.se> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Zoho-Virus-Status: 2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2014 23:20:00 -0000 On 12/27, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > Lenovo X201i > FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #0 r276028: Sun Dec 21 22:48:24 CET 2014 > > set > # sysctl hw.syscons.bell=0 > > But console still generates loud beeps, to my frustration. > > Did I miss something? This laptop ran 9-STABLE before and did not beep > at me. Suggestions? I was having the same problem. vt(4) is the default console driver in 10-STABLE, as well as the default starting with 10.0-RELEASE when booting via UEFI, so the 'hw.syscons.bell' setting no longer has meaning in that context. There doesn't seem to be a vt-specific analog for it yet. -- "A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams