From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Jul 20 14:53:57 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA04350 for isp-outgoing; Sun, 20 Jul 1997 14:53:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Wicked.eaznet.com ([206.62.254.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA04345 for ; Sun, 20 Jul 1997 14:53:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wicked.eaznet.com ([206.62.254.145]) by Wicked.eaznet.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA07343; Sun, 20 Jul 1997 14:55:31 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <33D289BD.467D2BC6@eaznet.com> Date: Sun, 20 Jul 1997 14:57:17 -0700 From: Eddie Fry Organization: Creative Solutions X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.0b4 [en] (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jacob Suter , freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portmaster 3 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) References: <33D1AEE7.B3D1DDFC@linus.intrastar.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------0389614EC5F5F76870556C7A" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk --------------0389614EC5F5F76870556C7A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jacob, Jacob Suter wrote: > Were the USR-TC's on the CT1's or were they on > analog? If they were > not They were on analog lines. Do you think it may be a problem with the telco? Some of our users aren't having any problems at all. Although, I haven't seen any logins at > 28.8k. Hmmm... Eddie > on the same CT1's, I'd start bitching out the > telco. Also, try > testing > other versions of the ComOS (3.5b8 is good and > has 33.6k code). If > Livingston & Lucent would get on the ball the > entire problem would > leave, as Lucent already has (supposibly) good > software for their > DSP's. > > JS > > Gary D. Margiotta wrote: > > > > I have a confusing problem. I've recently > installed a PM3 with > > ComOS > > > 3.5.1b20 on a channelized T-1. A lot of my > customers now complain > > that > > > they keep getting disconnected from the > network or they get > messages > > > > > when they log in that they cannot establish > a network connection. > > We > > > were previously using a USR Total Control > and these customers had > no > > > > > problems. Does anybody have any ideas? > > > > Honestly, go search the Portmaster-users > mailing list at > > Livinston....I > > was on the list for a while and there were > many similar problems > like > > the > > one you are having...I don't remember what > exactly it was that was > the > > > > problem in most cases, but it might've been > buggy code...I think > > 3.5.1b8 > > was the most stable one they had at that time. > > > > > -Gary Margiotta > > TBE Internet Services > > http://www.tbe.net --------------0389614EC5F5F76870556C7A Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jacob,

Jacob Suter wrote:

Were the USR-TC's on the CT1's or were they on analog?  If they were
not
They were on analog lines.  Do you think it may be a problem with the telco?  Some of our users aren't having any problems at all.  Although, I haven't seen any logins at > 28.8k.

Hmmm...

Eddie

on the same CT1's, I'd start bitching out the telco.  Also, try
testing
other versions of the ComOS (3.5b8 is good and has 33.6k code).  If
Livingston & Lucent would get on the ball the entire problem would
leave, as Lucent already has (supposibly) good software for their
DSP's.

JS

Gary D. Margiotta wrote:

> > I have a confusing problem.  I've recently installed a PM3 with
> ComOS
> > 3.5.1b20 on a channelized T-1.  A lot of my customers now complain
> that
> > they keep getting disconnected from the network or they get
messages
>
> > when they log in that they cannot establish a network connection.
> We
> > were previously using a USR Total Control and these customers had
no
>
> > problems.  Does anybody have any ideas?
>
> Honestly, go search the Portmaster-users mailing list at
> Livinston....I
> was on the list for a while and there were many similar problems
like
> the
> one you are having...I don't remember what exactly it was that was
the
>
> problem in most cases, but it might've been buggy code...I think
> 3.5.1b8
> was the most stable one they had at that time.
>
> -Gary Margiotta
> TBE Internet Services
> http://www.tbe.net

  --------------0389614EC5F5F76870556C7A--