Date: Tue, 17 Oct 1995 14:48:50 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: nate@rocky.sri.MT.net (Nate Williams) Cc: terry@lambert.org, bde@zeta.org.au, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Optimizations matter? ( was Re: netisr code..) Message-ID: <199510172148.OAA28478@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199510171910.NAA07670@rocky.sri.MT.net> from "Nate Williams" at Oct 17, 95 01:10:37 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> But, given 'optimized' versions and corresponding 'C' versions of the > code is a nice tradeoff. That way a person can (hopefully) see what the > code is attempting to do in a more readable manner while still having > access to highly optimized implementations as well. The trick being to keep both sets of code updated on interface changes. 8-(. One might require that interface changes be made to the C code first? Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199510172148.OAA28478>