From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 23 09:29:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19196106566C for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 09:29:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a_best01@uni-muenster.de) Received: from zivm-relay2.uni-muenster.de (ZIVM-RELAY2.UNI-MUENSTER.DE [128.176.192.13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C7C48FC0A for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 09:28:58 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.52,261,1270418400"; d="scan'208";a="242805895" Received: from zivmaildisp1.uni-muenster.de (HELO ZIVMAILUSER01.UNI-MUENSTER.DE) ([128.176.188.85]) by zivm-relay2.uni-muenster.de with ESMTP; 23 Apr 2010 11:28:58 +0200 Received: by ZIVMAILUSER01.UNI-MUENSTER.DE (Postfix, from userid 149459) id 69C381B0769; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:28:58 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:28:56 +0200 (CEST) From: Alexander Best Sender: Organization: Westfaelische Wilhelms-Universitaet Muenster To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Switchover to CAM ATA? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 09:29:00 -0000 has anybody thought about adding scsi support to burncd(8)? i've been using ATA CAM for quite a while now and really love it. however i miss burncd(8). i found it to be much easier to use and less buggy than cdrecord(1). since eventually the whole ata(4) subsystem will be dumped in favour of cam(4) i guess the fate of ata(4) dependant binaries in the base should also be discussed. maybe somebody could put together a list of ata(4) dependant binaries currently in base in addition to burncd(8) and atacontrol(8)? -- Alexander Best