Date: 25 Apr 2003 17:41:46 -0700 From: swear@attbi.com (Gary W. Swearingen) To: ".VWV." <victorvittorivonwiktow@interfree.it> Cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ufs and ext Message-ID: <eeadee9jjp.dee@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <200304252345.55600.victorvittorivonwiktow@interfree.it> References: <200304250203.28738.victorvittorivonwiktow@interfree.it> <3EA9B589.AAD7A527@mindspring.com> <200304252345.55600.victorvittorivonwiktow@interfree.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
".VWV." <victorvittorivonwiktow@interfree.it> writes: > > > I have noticed both BSD and Linux pre-compiled kernels cannot mount > > > read-write the other filesystem. It's a shame that a newbie could think > > > one is able to read, the other one is able to write. We know ufs was born > > > before ext. Some Linux distributions has also adopted ReiserFS on Linux, > > > that's really a not-unix filesystem. Why at PASC nobody has declared > > > what's the best standard? There is one pretty-good almost-filesystem standard which I've used successfully, namely "tar". You can write and read a tarball on an otherwise-unused partition (ie, raw device, no real filesystem) from multiple types of OSes.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?eeadee9jjp.dee>