From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 29 10:22:25 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freeway.dcfinc.com (cx74889-a.phnx3.az.home.com [24.1.193.157]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E09F37B644 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 10:21:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chad@freeway.dcfinc.com) Received: (from chad@localhost) by freeway.dcfinc.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA16584; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 11:21:04 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from chad) From: "Chad R. Larson" Message-Id: <200003291821.LAA16584@freeway.dcfinc.com> Subject: Re: Let 3.x die ASAP? In-Reply-To: from Didier Derny at "Mar 29, 0 03:14:04 pm" To: didier@omnix.net (Didier Derny) Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 11:21:04 -0700 (MST) Cc: jkh@zippy.cdrom.com, cracauer@cons.org, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: chad@DCFinc.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG As I recall, Didier Derny wrote: > I can't an many people can't upgrade the system on their machine > at the actual rythm of FreeBSD version (each one supposed to be the best > one and solve most of the problems :-))) ) > without a real stability (like the one with 2.x) this product > has no more value than linux or solaris, sco... So, is there some feature in the 3.x line that isn't in 2.2.x that you can't live without? If not, your course is clear. Put up a 2.2-STABLE system and quit worrying about stability. -crl -- Chad R. Larson (CRL15) 602-953-1392 Brother, can you paradigm? chad@dcfinc.com chad@larsons.org larson1@home.net DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message