From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 12:10:17 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 543CB1E76 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:10:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 981F21E4 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:10:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id KAA04251; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 10:19:49 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1U8RNd-000FGQ-C7; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 10:19:49 +0200 Message-ID: <5125D8A6.2050409@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 10:19:50 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130220 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: d@delphij.net Subject: Re: -CURRENT userland regression References: <51254ACE.2030100@delphij.net> <51254C7E.9050705@gmail.com> <20130220222518.GT2598@kib.kiev.ua> <51254E51.1070702@delphij.net> <20130220223704.GU2598@kib.kiev.ua> <5125595D.5010508@delphij.net> In-Reply-To: <5125595D.5010508@delphij.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Konstantin Belousov , FreeBSD Current , Xin Li , Navdeep Parhar X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:10:17 -0000 on 21/02/2013 01:16 Xin Li said the following: > I think it's unlikely -- I have r247057 of sys/ which worked fine... > > userland 246957 works good by the way. Just a very wild guess - are you sure that it is the userland that is to blame? It is rather unfortunate that we install boot blocks, including loader which gets _really_ installed, as part of installworld (and they are built as part of buildworld). So there is a possibility that it is loader that causes the trouble. I would try to rule that out. -- Andriy Gapon