From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Oct 6 15:06:14 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id PAA20188 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 6 Oct 1995 15:06:14 -0700 Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id PAA20174 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 1995 15:06:01 -0700 Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id PAA02318; Fri, 6 Oct 1995 15:03:29 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199510062203.PAA02318@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: 52gig RAID, causes panic To: dufault@hda.com (Peter Dufault) Date: Fri, 6 Oct 1995 15:03:29 -0700 (MST) Cc: wilko@yedi.iaf.nl, henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199510061207.IAA02937@hda.com> from "Peter Dufault" at Oct 6, 95 08:07:51 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 526 Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > > BTW are multiple LUNs working well? Our RAID systems make heavy use of 'm. > > I just used multiple LUNS while testing a scanner and it worked OK. > > There were reports of failures with multiple LUNS with a CD changer, > though it may not be LUN related. What is the interaction between LUN switching, Tagged Queuing, and SCSI disconnect? I'd think it would be. uh, unpleasent. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.