From owner-freebsd-security Sun Nov 28 17: 9:12 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mail.vr.IN-Berlin.DE (gnu.in-berlin.de [192.109.42.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 108F615436 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 1999 17:09:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from server.nostromo.in-berlin.de!ripley@servicia.in-berlin.de) Received: from uriela.in-berlin.de (IDENT:root@servicia.in-berlin.de [192.109.42.145]) by mail.vr.IN-Berlin.DE (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA19107 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 1999 02:09:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from server.nostromo.in-berlin.de!ripley@servicia.in-berlin.de) Received: by uriela.in-berlin.de (Smail-3.2.0.101 1997-Dec-17 #1) id m11sGqr-000VRLC; Mon, 29 Nov 1999 03:47:41 +0100 (CET) Received: (from ripley@localhost) by server.nostromo.in-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id BAA34203 for freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 29 Nov 1999 01:17:15 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ripley) Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 01:17:15 +0100 From: "H. Eckert" To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Question about lo0 Message-ID: <19991129011715.A32493@server.nostromo.in-berlin.de> References: <14400.17989.189233.907961@anarcat.dyndns.org> <38405B15.64786825@pucrs.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.6i In-Reply-To: <38405B15.64786825@pucrs.br>; from Mauricio Westendorff Pegoraro on Sat, Nov 27, 1999 at 08:28:38PM -0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Quoting Mauricio Westendorff Pegoraro (mwp@pucrs.br): > lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 > > > My question is: why the lo0 interface wasn't configured when the > system started? It was a problem (bug) when freebsd tryied to > configure lo0? Or, by default, freebsd doesn't 'autoconfigure' lo0? By default, lo0 is configured from within /etc/rc.conf as shown in /etc/defaults/rc.conf: network_interfaces="auto" # List of network interfaces (or "auto"). ifconfig_lo0="inet 127.0.0.1" # default loopback device configuration. It could be that the way you set up you network interface resulted in network_interfaces being set but lo0 missing from the list. > last couple years I've been working only with Solaris, AIX and Linux). Don't worry. I set up Sol7 on my other machine and haven't even figured out why the darned thing complained about my NIC being on IRQ10 (which it probed correctly) and how to get it on my LAN. X11 performance felt like the 486/50 machine I had as a server and some ways I felt thrown back into the stone ages. Not to mention that it couldn't deal with the 16gig drive... Greetings, Ripley -- H. Eckert, 10777 Berlin, Germany, http://www.in-berlin.de/User/nostromo/ ISO 8859-1: Ä=Ae, Ö=Oe, Ü=Ue, ä=ae, ö=oe, ü=ue, ß=sz. "(Technobabbel)" (Jetrel) - "Müssen wir uns diesen Schwachsinn wirklich anhören?" (Neelix) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message