From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Feb 26 01:32:38 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id BAA07633
          for current-outgoing; Mon, 26 Feb 1996 01:32:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asstdc.scgt.oz.au (root@asstdc.scgt.oz.au [202.14.234.65])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id BAA07627
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 26 Feb 1996 01:32:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from imb@localhost)
	by asstdc.scgt.oz.au (8.6.12/BSD4.4)
	id UAA05214 for current@freebsd.org; Mon, 26 Feb 1996 20:29:07 +1100
From: michael butler <imb@scgt.oz.au>
Message-Id: <199602260929.UAA05214@asstdc.scgt.oz.au>
Subject: Opti 82C895 cache coherency ?
To: current@freebsd.org
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 1996 20:29:06 +1100 (EST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24beta]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

I wonder if anyone can vouch for an Opti 82C895/82C602 motherboard with an
AMD 486DX4/100 in respect of cache coherency. Specifically, in combination
with an Adaptec 2842 (VLB) controller. Just trying to track down a "quirk"
with a (sort of working) -stable .. I don't know if it's -stable or the
motherboard :-(

	michael