From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 30 12:11:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCE9416A41F for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 12:11:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leo@finalresort.org) Received: from av10-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (av10-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42AF243D46 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 12:11:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from leo@finalresort.org) Received: by av10-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 8C409389D0; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 14:11:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp4-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (smtp4-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.92]) by av10-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E0A387C0 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 14:11:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.4.1.100] (81-232-129-114-no21.tbcn.telia.com [81.232.129.114]) by smtp4-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E9A37E49 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 14:11:50 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <442BCB05.6080000@finalresort.org> Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 14:11:49 +0200 From: "Leo R. Lundgren" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Macintosh/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 12:18:01 +0000 Subject: mdmfs -P X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 12:11:52 -0000 Hey all, Is there any way we could get the somewhat new -P option of mdmfs (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sbin/mdmfs/mdmfs.c.diff?r1=1.25&r2=1.26) to be put into -stable as well? As far as I can see from the diff, there's no way it would break any existing implementation/usage of mdmfs, but the feature is highly desired, has been for years. With it all I need for my case is a line in an fstab, without it I need to have three lines in rc.local/equiv instead, and it's still not as dynamic as it should be, of course. Pretty please? =) PS: Please reply to me directly as well, since I'm not subscribed to this list (tracking stable). Thank you! Kind regards, // Leo