Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 10 Dec 1997 11:18:18 -0500 (EST)
From:      "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net>
To:        lightningfire@lightspeed.net (Lightning Firestormer)
Cc:        dyson@FreeBSD.ORG, questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Can't get FreeBSD 2.2.5 to recognize controller card
Message-ID:  <199712101618.LAA00857@dyson.iquest.net>
In-Reply-To: <199712101029.CAA06916@lsbsdi1.lightspeed.net> from Lightning Firestormer at "Dec 10, 97 02:29:05 am"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Lightning Firestormer said:
> > Subject:       Re: Can't get FreeBSD 2.2.5 to recognize controller card
> > To:            lightningfire@lightspeed.net (Lightning Firestormer)
> > Date:          Wed, 10 Dec 1997 05:20:40 -0500 (EST)
> > Cc:            questions@FreeBSD.ORG
> > From:          "John S. Dyson" <dyson@FreeBSD.ORG>
> > Reply-to:      dyson@FreeBSD.ORG
> 
> > Lightning Firestormer said:
> > > Greetings.
> > > 
> > > I downloaded FreeBSD 2.2.5 the other day, and when I went to attempt 
> > > to install it I found that it won't detect my PCI-based controller 
> > > card.   The unit is a Promise Technologies Ultra33 (the card has been 
> > > on the market since May).   Is there anything I can do to get FreeBSD 
> > > to recognize it?
> > > 
> > FreeBSD-current works with it.
> 
> What's the word on how long until the support that FreeBSD-current 
> has for the card becomes part of FreeBSD-stable?   I've enough 
> trouble with configuration on this heavily-customized system, and I 
> try to avoid the bleeding edge like the plaque (this system is messy 
> enough to troubleshoot as-is).
> 
Unfortunately, it will likely be when -current becomes -stable. :-(.  The
problem has to do with the size of the changes, and hopefully, -stable
is feature frozen.  Every time we try to do something massive in -stable,
we break things terribly.  This is NOT meant as arrogance or anything,
but the problems abound when we try to do things like that.  Our regression
testing isn't adequate, and so we tend to like to keep -stable "golden."

One bad thing, there are times that we do make the mistake of adding something
"necessary" and that is usually a heap of trouble.

-- 
John
dyson@freebsd.org
jdyson@nc.com



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199712101618.LAA00857>