From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Sat Dec 17 06:12:25 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A3BC84C6B for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 06:12:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B36E1B68 for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 06:12:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id uBH6CD6g055962; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 17:12:13 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2016 17:12:13 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Herrero_Carr=C3=B3n?= cc: freebsd-stable Subject: Re: Upgrading boot from GPT(BIOS) to GPT(UEFI) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20161217170412.V26979@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2016 06:12:25 -0000 On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 18:08:34 +0100, Fernando Herrero Carrón wrote: > Hi everyone, Hi, you've had plenty of helpful responses, but nobody has commented on: > My only reason for wanting to boot with UEFI is faster boot, > everything is working fine otherwise. I'm skeptical that UEFI boot would be any or noticeably faster than via BIOS, but am interested in hearing of any experiences regarding that. cheers, Ian