From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 7 11:44:08 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id LAA02765 for java-outgoing; Wed, 7 Jan 1998 11:44:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (sri-gw.MT.net [206.127.105.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA02729 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 1998 11:43:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nate@mt.sri.com) Received: from mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by ns.mt.sri.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id MAA00510; Wed, 7 Jan 1998 12:43:42 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com) Received: by mt.sri.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id MAA02544; Wed, 7 Jan 1998 12:43:41 -0700 Date: Wed, 7 Jan 1998 12:43:41 -0700 Message-Id: <199801071943.MAA02544@mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: gclarkii@main.brewich.com (Gary B. Clark II) Subject: Re: Motif question In-Reply-To: <199801071831.MAA13303@damon.com> References: <199801071652.KAA02364@main.brewich.com> <199801071831.MAA13303@damon.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.29 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org [ Moved to -java :) ] Damon Anton Permezel writes: > Perhaps we can attempt a coordinated effort to address some of these > problems? I'm in the process (like in *RIGHT NOW*) setting up a remote CVS tree that I hope people will consider using for FreeBSD java development. Access will require that I know you have access to the actual Sun sources (I have ideas on how to do this), and that you connect to the site using SSH. I've got a machine setup to do this already, so I don't forsee any problems, but I am wondering if I actual do this if people will voluntarily give up 'local access' to their sources and instead try to move through a centralized tree on a remote site. If it does, please reply to the group. Note, unfortunately due to the nature of the sources, public access won't be made, and the CVS commit email may or may not be made available. The CVS tree is almost ready to go, but I have to go through it a bit and sanitize the bits. I'll probably setup a pseudo-private email list for folks to talk about actual JDK porting issues, but is this at all interesting to those who are actually hacking on the JDK sources? Nate