From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 1 10:23:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B61216A4FC for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 10:23:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com) Received: from mail.netplex.net (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0E5413C45A for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 10:23:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.netplex.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id m11ADMB2014750; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 05:13:22 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.netplex.net) X-Greylist: Message whitelisted by DRAC access database, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.10]); Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:13:23 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 05:13:22 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net To: Julian Elischer In-Reply-To: <47A2C38B.7050804@elischer.org> Message-ID: References: <47A21ED6.5070303@elischer.org> <47A25206.6070406@delphij.net> <47A25993.6050200@elischer.org> <47A25CED.4010504@delphij.net> <47A26D12.30205@elischer.org> <47A27AF3.2020701@delphij.net> <47A27C08.3010709@elischer.org> <47A28023.9000105@delphij.net> <47A290E7.4040900@elischer.org> <47A2C38B.7050804@elischer.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: d@delphij.net, FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: needs a tester with an SMP 7.0 box X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 10:23:56 -0000 On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Julian Elischer wrote: > Daniel Eischen wrote: >> On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Julian Elischer wrote: >> >>> Xin LI wrote: >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>> Hash: SHA1 >>>> >>>> Julian Elischer wrote: >>>>>> I'm not sure why, but a fresh RELENG_7_0 with your patch, plus DDB >>>>>> enabled does not trigger the problem :-/ >>>>>> >>>>> what happens without the patch? >>>> >>>> No, I mean that it used to crash with previous kernel which is built >>>> only a couple of days ago, no more than a week. You want me to test the >>>> case without patch? >>>> >>> >>> We need to detirmine >>> 1/ whether there is a problem in 7.0 in the first place. if not, we are >>> done. >>> >>> 2/ whether the patch fixes it if there is a problem. >> >> I think it's safe to say that it _is_ a potential problem in both >> -current, 7.0 and 6.x. I committed it to -current without trying >> to duplicate the problem. > > yes but 7.0 is in countdown where -current isn't So? It's a problem, and moreso libkse is not the default in 7.0, so what is the harm in playing it safe and MFC'ing it now so as to not hold up 7.0 any longer? -- DE