From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 8 02:16:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5092416A415 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2006 02:16:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zaa@ulstu.ru) Received: from kernel.ulstu.ru (kernel.ulstu.ru [62.76.34.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 698EF43CA2 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2006 02:15:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zaa@ulstu.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kernel.ulstu.ru (ulstuMail) with ESMTP id 5B3004AE24; Fri, 8 Dec 2006 05:16:32 +0300 (MSK) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ulstu.ru Received: from kernel.ulstu.ru ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kernel.ulstu.ru [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XGdAFZBeEKyb; Fri, 8 Dec 2006 05:16:26 +0300 (MSK) Received: from orion.ulstu.ru (orion.ulstu.ru [62.76.34.33]) by kernel.ulstu.ru (ulstuMail) with ESMTP id 7F3EF4AE21 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2006 05:16:25 +0300 (MSK) Received: by orion.ulstu.ru (Postfix, from userid 3909) id DC2A41AFE; Fri, 8 Dec 2006 05:16:25 +0300 (MSK) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 05:16:25 +0300 From: Alexander Zhuravlev To: ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20061208021625.GB3574@orion.ulstu.ru> Mail-Followup-To: ports@FreeBSD.org References: <20061206125657.GB1814@straylight.m.ringlet.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061206125657.GB1814@straylight.m.ringlet.net> Cc: Subject: Re: [CFR] ftp/curl update and API incompatibility X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 02:16:47 -0000 On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 02:56:57PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > - Not sure how to proceed with the PORTREVISION here, and also in > www/pecl-pecl_http - it seems that it is not customary for a PHP extension > to have a different PORTREVISION from the main port? Patch for pecl-pecl_http looks ok. Also, you may bump PORTREVISION in pecl ports also. Thank you for your efforts. -- Alexander Zhuravlev