From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Nov 5 11:30:26 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id LAA10120 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 5 Nov 1995 11:30:26 -0800 Received: from mail.infinet.com (ns.infinet.com [198.30.154.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with SMTP id LAA10113 for ; Sun, 5 Nov 1995 11:30:12 -0800 Received: from donna by mail.infinet.com with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #9) id m0tCAhD-000KHrC; Sun, 5 Nov 95 14:25 EST Message-ID: <309BBF31.5A88@cylatech.com> Date: Sat, 04 Nov 1995 14:29:53 -0500 From: Wilson MacGyver X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b1J (Windows; I; 32bit) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anyone got FreeBSD working a P6? References: <15480.815528900@time.cdrom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > > Amancio Hasty Jr. writes: > Truly, the UNIX and UNIX clones may get a boost from the P6 because, > at least for awhile, they're going to be getting the most > bang-for-buck out of it. Once all those 16 bit legacy apps go 32 bit, > however, you'll see Windows regain the advantages it temporarily lost. > I don't think that the P6 will be a "flop" at all, at least not in the > longer term. Even Intel and Micrsoft knows this, both company are downplaying "Running Win 95" on P6. Both recommands NT instead. -- Wilson MacGyver macgyver@cylatech.com -------------------------------------- Veni, Vidi, Concidi.