From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Sep 27 07:01:12 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id HAA01230
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 27 Sep 1995 07:01:12 -0700
Received: from fang.cs.sunyit.edu (fang.cs.sunyit.edu [192.52.220.66])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id HAA01225
          for <hackers@freefall.freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 1995 07:01:08 -0700
Received: (from uttt@localhost) by fang.cs.sunyit.edu (8.6.9/8.6.9) id KAA13023 for hackers@freefall.freebsd.org; Wed, 27 Sep 1995 10:01:06 -0400
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 1995 10:01:06 -0400
From: "Tom T. Tran" <uttt@fang.cs.sunyit.edu>
Message-Id: <199509271401.KAA13023@fang.cs.sunyit.edu>
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92)
To: hackers@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Solaris x86
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

        With all the talk of SCO compatability and Linux compatability I was 
wondering if perhaps Solaris x86 might be on the horizon. I'm curious as to
whether or not having the system call wrappers for Linux and SCO bring us
any closer to having Solaris x86 binary compatability.

-- 
If you can lead it to water and force it to drink, it isn't a horse.