From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 27 23:30:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0333106564A for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 23:30:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D338FC0C for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 23:30:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7RNUBar037411 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 23:30:11 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q7RNUBxr037408; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 23:30:11 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 23:30:11 GMT Message-Id: <201208272330.q7RNUBxr037408@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Mark Linimon Cc: Subject: Re: ports/170946: [patch] mark certain ports broken on ARM X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mark Linimon List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 23:30:11 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/170946; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mark Linimon To: Mark Linimon Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/170946: [patch] mark certain ports broken on ARM Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 18:24:03 -0500 In response to the question about "are there any arm machines in the cluster" (sorry, I apparently have deleted the original): "not yet". I am hoping to use what we have now to write up a propsal saying how many machines we need, how we will have remote control for them, and so forth. mcl