From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Mar 15 11:50:31 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from holly.dyndns.org (adsl-208-191-149-232.dsl.hstntx.swbell.net [208.191.149.232]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5157037B405 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 11:50:29 -0800 (PST) Received: (from chris@localhost) by holly.dyndns.org (8.11.6/8.9.3) id g2FJo0985056; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 13:50:00 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from chris) Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 13:49:58 -0600 From: Chris Costello To: Hiten Pandya Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Should the stat(2) man page contain information on test macros Message-ID: <20020315134958.C82311@holly.calldei.com> Reply-To: chris@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20020315194208.A25074@hpdi.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020315194208.A25074@hpdi.ath.cx>; from hiten@uk.FreeBSD.org on Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 07:42:08PM +0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Friday, March 15, 2002, Hiten Pandya wrote: > OK, is it a good idea, to have the S_IS* macros documented in the > stat(2) man page, or are they documented in the man pages (other > than stat(2)) already? :) Just cross-reference to a man page that has them. chmod(2) seems to be the most logical choice. -- +-------------------+--------------------------------------------+ | Chris Costello | Performance is easier to add than clarity. | | chris@FreeBSD.org | | +-------------------+--------------------------------------------+ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message