From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 27 16:56:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4A5716A4CE; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:56:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C6D43D5C; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:56:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.19] (ibook-nai.samsco.home [192.168.254.19]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j0RGx58L007530; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:59:06 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <41F91D27.6070409@samsco.org> Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:56:07 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hiroki Sato References: <20050128.012009.70747717.hrs@allbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20050128.012009.70747717.hrs@allbsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pooker.samsco.org cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: E3500/E4500 not supported? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:56:08 -0000 Hiroki Sato wrote: > Hi, > > Is the following description in www/en/platforms/sparc.sgml still true? > > The following systems are supported, but can only be netbooted due to > the onboard scsi controller being unsupported. Work is underway to add > support for this scsi controller. These systems may work with the esp > driver imported from NetBSD. > > - Enterprise 3500 > - Enterprise 4500 > > I tried 5.3-RELEASE on E4500 with SBus I/O board but the SCSI > controller (FAS366) was recognized as esp(4) and it seemed to work fine. > Although I do not know the PCI board-only case, I think it should > be explained in sparc.sgml. Did somebody try these machines? > I didn't know that such beasts existed. If they have a FAS366 and you are confirming that they work, then I see nothing wrong with correcting the text. Note that our esp driver only works with SBUS, so I'm not sure what you mean about PCI. Scott