From owner-freebsd-bugs  Mon Sep 23 02:00:09 1996
Return-Path: owner-bugs
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id CAA06681
          for bugs-outgoing; Mon, 23 Sep 1996 02:00:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id CAA06639;
          Mon, 23 Sep 1996 02:00:04 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 1996 02:00:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199609230900.CAA06639@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs
Cc: 
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Subject: Re: bin/1665: libexec-telnetd deficiency
Reply-To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

The following reply was made to PR bin/1665; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
To: bde@zeta.org.au, pjchilds@imforei.apana.org.au
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: bin/1665: libexec-telnetd deficiency
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 1996 18:54:33 +1000

 > I'm not sure why it is considered harmful(?) either, but thats why
 > i'm not doing the commits, and you guys are :)
 
 It's usually non-committers that find things harmful :-).
 
 For gettytab, people complained that advertising the O/S version is
 a security hole.  That was just for %r.  %v gives even more information.
 
 Bruce