From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 7 01:41:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF7B716A4CE for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 01:41:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CCF243D1D for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 01:41:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gert.cuykens@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id f1so673211rne for ; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 17:41:28 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=q+FzvPu0aS3j3u58Xm0Hoow3PbPUbdrGW3mWWmPZrBzm6N73fgtSK/5brVEr7YQpyqzmC1I5RJYf07UPpeN6vYlZOgjXBetjL2GqSRc6O518IX0sFSq+hSwk7Ou8q/W9F7Zy5AB8PF5Qdczi0yYVP5muSVNm2lvN7FHU/KYpVcQ= Received: by 10.38.149.55 with SMTP id w55mr574364rnd; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 17:41:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.74.23 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 17:41:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 02:41:25 +0100 From: Gert Cuykens To: albi In-Reply-To: <4206C641.5000609@scii.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <4206C641.5000609@scii.nl> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xine bus error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gert Cuykens List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 01:41:31 -0000 On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 02:37:05 +0100, albi wrote: > Gert Cuykens wrote: > > >>you could try : > >>cd /usr/ports/multimedia/mplayer-skins > >>make NO_CHECKSUM=yes install > >> > >>and then compile mplayer itself > >> > > > > > > Will the no check sum only be applied to the skin port only ? > > yes > > > > > PS why does the maintainer not fix the port ? > > no idea, > > life is short, time is not cheap etc. > Why do they call it NO_CHECKSUM ? whats wrong with CHECKSUM yes no ?