From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 11 03:40:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9469016A41C for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 03:40:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from llwang@infor.ck.tp.edu.tw) Received: from infor.ck.tp.edu.tw (infor.ck.tp.edu.tw [203.64.26.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 484FA43D48 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 03:40:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from llwang@infor.ck.tp.edu.tw) Received: by infor.ck.tp.edu.tw (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 416EA45E77; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 11:40:26 +0800 (CST) Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 11:40:26 +0800 From: "Li-Lun Wang (Leland Wang)" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050711034026.GA32003@Athena.infor.org> Mail-Followup-To: "Li-Lun Wang (Leland Wang)" , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-action=pgp-signed Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Appropriate PORTVERSION for 1.97Ed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 03:40:28 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, A port I am maintaining just updated its version from 1.97E to 1.97Ed. I can't set PORTVERSION to 1.97Ed since letter strings are not allowed. If I change it to 1.97E.d, portlint argues that 1.97E.d is less than 1.97E, and it also fails. Is it appropriate if I just leave PORTVERSION as 1.97E and bump PORTREVISION instead? - -- Leland Wang -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC0eooCQM7t5B2mhARAjpQAJ4yn20k+zq9EO8TTd6okrpFItg3LgCdGDsh A6qgLE6d4T8dxjPEjJEFYwc= =t/WH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----