From owner-freebsd-mips@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 20 15:39:38 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mips@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 651095CD; Mon, 20 May 2013 15:39:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-mips@dino.sk) Received: from mailhost.netlab.sk (mailhost.netlab.sk [84.245.65.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98E0E164; Mon, 20 May 2013 15:39:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zeta.dino.sk (fw1.dino.sk [84.245.95.252]) (AUTH: LOGIN milan, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,128bits,AES128-SHA) by mailhost.netlab.sk with ESMTPSA; Mon, 20 May 2013 17:39:39 +0200 id 004EB830.519A43BB.00005E71 Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 17:39:34 +0200 From: Milan Obuch To: Juli Mallett Subject: Re: Ubiquiti EdgeRouter Lite works multi-user with -CURRENT. Message-ID: <20130520173934.099ea541@zeta.dino.sk> In-Reply-To: References: <20130516111059.38543d57@wind.dino.sk> <20130516131642.adfae355aa3bf7767e9b56e5@ddteam.net> <20130516124248.33ae4e05@wind.dino.sk> <51952112.9010607@rewt.org.uk> <20130517192206.5db0533f@zeta.dino.sk> <51966CB6.2040701@rewt.org.uk> <20130520110659.1d1d2165@zeta.dino.sk> <20130520164001.5f7d99b8@zeta.dino.sk> <20130520172508.087daf7b@zeta.dino.sk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.17; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1) Face: 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 X-Face: ak5rwz4-aUa>hPFZlcg,bXxn.(TN}e9DGFrKU\.i_'B[&5=pAd9o"j)5VSUYW:BRQG#^42Ev$Il|; Ztn=,C X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/amd64 8.2-STABLE Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Aleksandr Rybalko , "freebsd-mips@FreeBSD.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-mips@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to MIPS List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 15:39:38 -0000 On Mon, 20 May 2013 08:27:40 -0700, Juli Mallett wrote: > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Milan Obuch > wrote: > > Yes, output is from 'gpioctl -f /dev/gpioc0 -lv' command execution. > > Actually, I wrote all 16 pins (0 to 15) in > > sys/mips/cavium/octeon_gpio.c so I can see quickly which GPIO pin > > is connected to reset switch. Pin 11 changed when pressing the > > switch. > > Could you try commenting out everything but pin 11 in octeon_gpio.c > and rebuilding? I'm wondering if one of those pins may have been > in-use to talk to some Ethernet hardware or something like that, and > that its operation was disrupted by the GPIO driver. As far as I know, it behaved this way even before I added those pin definition into GPIO driver. Actually, full output is gpioctl -f /dev/gpioc0 -lv pin 00: 0 F/D0, caps: pin 01: 0 F/D1, caps: pin 02: 0 F/D2, caps: pin 03: 0 F/D3, caps: pin 04: 0 F/D4, caps: pin 05: 0 F/D5, caps: pin 06: 0 F/D6, caps: pin 07: 0 F/D7, caps: pin 08: 1 F/D8, caps: pin 09: 1 F/D9, caps: pin 10: 1 F/D10, caps: pin 11: 1 F/D11, caps: pin 12: 0 F/D12, caps: pin 13: 0 F/D13, caps: pin 14: 0 F/D14, caps: pin 15: 0 F/D15, caps: and does not change with link status on ethernet port (any). But I will test it with only pin 11 left there, just in case I overlooked something. Regards, Milan