Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 11:57:25 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gjournal.... Message-ID: <20080330185725.GI95731@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <20080330161702.GA8242@FS.denninger.net> References: <20080330031017.GA32063@FS.denninger.net> <20080330090617.GH95731@elvis.mu.org> <20080330161702.GA8242@FS.denninger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net> [080330 09:17] wrote: > On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 02:06:17AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > > If you're using a database then it shouldn't matter what meta data > > provider you use "all that much" with the exception of temporary > > tables. > > > > Basically, SU and gjournal both provide for meta data consistency, > > something that a database rarely needs as it rarely creates/deletes > > files often. > > > > I'm looking at this more from a performance standpoint. > > Is there a performance advantage to using gjournal over a "normal" UFS/UFS2 > filesystem with softupdates? I think that SU will be faster, but that's just a semi-educated guess. -- - Alfred Perlstein
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080330185725.GI95731>